In Euripides ancient play of Medea, a common theme of alienation and vengeance is conveyed. Medea, a barbaric Greek woman, is betrayed by her husband Jason, who abandons her to marry the royal daughter of King Creon. This series of unfortunate events thrusts Medea into a state of deep anger in which she vows to gain revenge. At first, my response to Medea is one of sympathy and sorrow, especially when she pleads with King Creon to give her an extra day of freedom before her exile. Another passage from the play where my feelings towards Medea are those of sympathy is when she offers to help Aegeus, King of Athens with conceiving a child in return for protection. However, these sentiments of sorrow are no longer present in my judgement of Medea when she plots to cleverly kill Jason and his new wife Glauce, along with her very own children. The offer to help Aegeus was merely a sly way of having a safe haven to reside in after she murdered so many people. Ultimately, when she kills Glauce, Creon and lastly her children, I can only have feelings of disgust for Medea. Her actions are extremely brutal and counterproductive; one can still feel sad for her because, after all, she is still a barbarian women who doesn't know any better and has been the victim to a serious betrayal.
The ending of Medea escaping to Athens on a chariot pulled by dragons can be interpreted in many ways. I believe that Euripides portrayed the ending in this manner to suggest her might and strength as a Greek woman. Additionally, the dragons represent utmost power and might which can suggest that the actions committed by Jason were unjust and that Medea deserved better. Escaping with the murder of her children can show that even though what she did was an awful deed, she did not bring it upon herself.
Medea
Saturday, September 22, 2012
Monday, September 17, 2012
Japanese vs Medieval Theater
The roots of Japanese and Medieval theater were significantly different; both the Skaldic form of theater and Bugaku attempt to honor and reenact the stories of warriors and heroes. However, the way they go about in portraying these themes is significantly different. Japanese forms of theater such as Bugaku implement slow and graceful movement to convey its messages while on the other hand a Skaldic play incorporates a poet as the narrator to a violent and heroic storyline. Additionally, Skaldic performances lacked Christian influence, as they were mainly an aristocratic art. Medieval forms of theater such as the Tegernsee Passion Play of 1180 also carry heavy political themes of church versus state while Japanese forms of theater such as Noh focus primarily on depicting ghosts, spirits, and other mystic themes not relating to religion. Medieval theater of Europe eventually came to a decline mainly due to the repercussions of religious/political influence, in this case the effect of the Protestant Reformation. On the contrary, theater in Japan seldom suffered from this sort of backlash due to its long time history as being free of religion.
Above is a picture of a typical Bugaku mask. Japanese theater heavily implemented the usage of masks and cosmetics.
Medieval Theater...
Above is a picture of a typical Bugaku mask. Japanese theater heavily implemented the usage of masks and cosmetics.
Medieval Theater...
Friday, September 7, 2012
Differences between Ancient Green and Roman Theater
Although much of Roman theater is influenced by Ancient Greek theater, they share a few significant differences that help distinguish Greek theater from Roman theater. For example, Greek performers were usually aristocrats that were high class members of society; theater in ancient Greece had evolved as a way to educate the masses about its history. On the contrary, the Romans utilized poor men, often slaves, as their performers in various forms of theater than included plays derived from literature, tragic dramas, comedies and the notorious gladiator battles. Greek theater also consisted of dramas and tragedies but their primary focus was to convey the history of their peoples, namely the history of major wars.
In a sense, Greek theater was implemented as a form of education and enlightenment while the Romans were concerned with organizing magnificent, large scale performances that reflected upon their imperial valor.
http://depthome.brooklyn.cuny.edu/classics/dunkle/comedy/romnthtr.htm
In a sense, Greek theater was implemented as a form of education and enlightenment while the Romans were concerned with organizing magnificent, large scale performances that reflected upon their imperial valor.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)